First of all — God created woman for man, not man for man and woman for woman. — Did you know that Sodomy came from the biblical city of Sodom? The city of Sodom and Gomorrah was destroyed because of the perverse acts of people & sexual acts between man & man, woman & woman. This proves that those sexual acts between the same sex is not welcome to eyes of God. The Philippines being a Christian country in the Asia should not encourage these acts much more marriage of the same sex.
Same sex marriage is morally incorrect and not accordance to the natural law or the natural order of things.
Same sex marriage does not promote the concept of Family.
First –> Who would be the husband and the wife?
Same sex couples tried to adopt kids to complete their family aspirations. However, this may just create further disorientation ti the adopted child as the meaning of family which consists of Mother and Father.
Please don’t get me wrong we are not condemning homos or gay couples. They can practice whatever they believe and what will make them happy. However legitimizing this through marriage is getting too far. If this will be allowed this may result to the mockery of the real meaning of marriage.
So what do you think? 
)
NO LEAKING ah. 
Here are the possible arguments against what you said respectively, just see if you could defend against them in the debate:
So many other things that humans created have gone against the natural orders of things. Humans have adapted to the ever changing modern technology and different human rights have also changed throughout the years, and all if not most have been a great achievement for mankind. Wouldn’t the acceptance of Homosexuals change everyone’s view for the better as well? To be more open minded to different ideas? Changes are NORMAL after all.
How can’t homosexual marriage promote the concept of family? Family is a unit in which love is expressed to each member by each other. Is not crossing the line of social acceptance to simply love another person a good example enough to define the term “love”?
-.- The husband and wife thing isn’t a good argument to begin with Josh
Well, if homosexual marriage were accepted, won’t that mean a few changes in the definition of “family” anyway? So what if someone has 2 fathers, if they know what’s best for you, they will love you and treasure you just the same.
Finally, marriage is a commitment bound by the emotion of love. Love is present regardless of what the person may look like, what their age may be (but being a pedophile is just wrong -.-) as well as their sex. If you cannot find another person like the person you love or cannot picture yourself with anyone other than that person, wouldn’t it be unfair to address this other human being’s request of being able to love. If they respect the sanctity of marriage than it cannot be wrong. They are bound by their faith and isn’t that what the typical Christian couple may want? They may feel discriminated enough by the text in their holy book, but cannot help it. Love is just love.
here you go
Going against the natural order of things can create problems. For example human intervention to the nature is now creating natural disasters and calamities. Technology though accepted by men, contributed to the destruction by nature. So not all that are accepted by men are good. If this is against the natural order of things then it is not proper.
Then if that is the definition of family then there’s no need for marriage.
)
That is not promoting the good values of a family, by having a father and a father. & they might not set a good example to the adopted children. But rather more confusion and disorientation.
If that is the definition of love then why wont they just love themselves and not get married, what’s the diff?
NOSEBLEED.
*Then if that is the definition of family then there’s no need for marriage.*
> no marriage = not a family? What about Brangelina? They’re not a family?
*If that is the definition of love then why wont they just love themselves and not get married, what’s the diff?*
> so, you can have a same sex relationship and live together, but you can’t get married? What about human rights? Isn’t marriage an expression of our love for a person?